With the Paris Agreement set to enter into force just before COP 22, attention is turning to how to implement the historic agreement: how do we achieve its commitments and how do we ramp up ambition over time?
For the first time, we have a global goal for climate change adaptation that is explicitly linked to progress on reducing greenhouse emissions to slow climate change. The Paris Agreement acknowledges that adaptation is a global challenge, but also emphasizes its local and sub-national dimensions that mean we need to enhance capacities at sub-national levels, and that we need to strengthen and support the efforts of local communities and indigenous peoples to respond to climate change. [i]
Engaging Sub-National Stakeholders in the NAP Process
National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) are a key tool for advancing adaptation, providing a process and framework for assessing development needs and climate vulnerabilities. Each country’s NAP process is an opportunity to identify and prioritize adaptation options, implement them, and monitor and evaluate progress and outcomes.
NAP processes also represent a critical opportunity for engaging sub-national stakeholders. Adaptation planners can use the NAP process for “vertical integration”: the process of creating intentional and strategic linkages between national and sub-national adaptation planning, implementation and monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
Vertical integration is not a single step in the NAP process–it is an ongoing effort to ensure on the one hand that local realities are reflected in the NAP, and on the other hand that the NAP enables adaptation at sub-national levels, including the local level.
Principles for More Inclusive, Effective NAP Processes
Recent decisions under the UNFCCC, notably the Cancun Agreements, identify principles which should guide countries’ implementation of their commitments. [ii] Applying these to the NAP process highlights the importance of vertical integration.
These principles suggest that NAP processes should be:
- Participatory: Participation is more than consultation–it requires active engagement and empowerment of stakeholders at all levels throughout planning, implementation and M&E of the NAP. Sub-national authorities and local organizations are typically well-placed to facilitate participation, as they are better connected to communities and are familiar with the particularities of the context at the local level.
- Undertaken with consideration of vulnerable groups, communities and ecosystems: This principle recognizes that countries are not homogenous in their vulnerability to climate change or their adaptation priorities. Vertical integration enables systematic recognition of sub-national diversity, providing entry points for vulnerable groups and communities to participate in the process, as well as opportunities to consider adaptation needs and priorities at the ecosystem level.
- Transparent: Transparency involves open and clear disclosure of information, plans, processes and actions.[iii] Vertical integration can contribute to transparency by enabling sharing of information between levels of government, thereby bridging the gap between decision-makers in the central government and the people they aim to support. Information sharing must be timely, accurate, relevant and accessible to enable different stakeholders at national and sub-national levels to analyze and use the information and engage with relevant adaptation processes and actions.[iv]
- Gender sensitive: Vertical integration strengthens NAP teams’ ability to take social diversity into account. This includes differences based on gender, recognizing that women and men experience the impacts of climate change differently, and that they have different needs and capacities for adaptation. Assessing needs and defining priorities with sub-national actors increases the likelihood that differences based on gender will be captured and that inequalities will be addressed in planning and implementation.
Moving Forward on Vertical Integration
Further, from a practical point of view, there is considerable evidence of the value of locally-driven approaches to adaptation.[v] Without attention to the implications of climate change for people’s livelihoods and local development progress, efforts to promote adaptation may be ineffective, or, at worst, maladaptive.
The most effective approach to the NAP process will therefore involve a mix of top-down and bottom-up approaches, with an explicit commitment from national actors to have an inclusive and participatory NAP process.
NAP processes are iterative; adaptation efforts will be most successful if they are supported by ongoing dialogue between national and sub-national actors, and if sub-national authorities and local organizations and communities are empowered with resources and capacity for adaptation.
Angie Dazé is the lead author of the publication, Vertical Integration in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes, which will be launched at COP 22 at a mini-side event on November 8, 2016.
[i] CoP (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement: Proposal by the President (Draft Decision -/CP.21). Report of the Conference of the Parties, Twenty-first session, Paris, 30 November to 11 December 2015.
[ii] Cancun decision. Retrieved from http://cancun.unfccc.int/
[iii] Transparency International (2016). Anti-Corruption Glossary: Transparency. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/glossary/term/transparency
[iv] Transparency Accountability Initiative (2016). Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.transparency-initiative.org/about/definitions
[v] See, for example: Ayers, J. & Forsyth, T. (2009). Community based adaptation to climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51 (4), pp. 22-31.
Any opinions stated in this blog post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of the NAP Global Network, its funders, or Network participants.
Interested in joining the Network as a participant? Find out more.