Analysis and commentary on the Network’s experiences coordinating climate-resilient development.
Analysis and commentary on the Network’s experiences coordinating climate-resilient development.
Julie Dekens (IISD), Blane Harvey (McGill University), Andrea K. Gerlak (University of Arizona), and Tanya Heikkila (University of Colorado Denver)
View Report The effectiveness of climate change adaptation decision making largely depends on how well governments and other actors embed deliberate learning into the policy process. Indeed, research shows that learning does not happen automatically—it needs to be created and nurtured. In the new report Integrating Learning in the National Adaptation Plan Process, Julie Dekens […]
At the UN Bonn Climate Change Conference (SB60) in June 2024, countries will initiate the assessment of the progress in formulating and implementing their NAPs.
At the 2024 UN Bonn Climate Change Conference, countries will initiate the assessment of the progress in the formulating and implementing their NAPs.
By Patrick Guerdat, Policy Advisor, NAP Global Network, International Institute for Sustainable Development
How do we know if National Adaptation Plans (NAP) are making a dent in reducing vulnerability? NAP progress reports play a critical role in assessing a country’s climate change preparedness and advising on next steps. They consolidate the information gathered from monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) activities and encourage countries to continuously learn, adapt, and improve on their climate change adaptation efforts.
Par Mesmin Tchindjang, enseignant et expert en adaptation aux changements climatiques
en prévision de la prochaine mise à jour du PNA, le Cameroun a entrepris une analyse technique avec le soutien du Réseau mondial de PNA en vue d’éclairer la création d’un système de suivi, d’évaluation et d’apprentissage d’adaptation.
By Emilie Beauchamp, Lead, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning for Adaptation to Climate Change, NAP Global Network, IISD
Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems are used to provide a structured approach to monitoring progress, evaluating results, and learning to ensure climate change adaptation strategies are effectively achieving their intended outcomes. This blog builds on what the NAP Global Network has learned about effective NAP processes to identify and explain the basics of a MEL system as part of NAP processes.
By Julie Dekens, Principal Researcher, NAP Global Network, IISD
Explore the four key avenues that countries should use to strengthen the links between their national Climate Risk Assessments and the evaluation of National Adaptation Plan processes.
Vulnerability assessments and monitoring, evaluation, and learning frameworks were validated as part of the Somali NAP process
Livestock and fisheries sectors are pivotal in the Somali economy and food security. Somalia achieved an important milestone in its NAP process by validating a vulnerability assessment (VA) and a monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) framework for both sectors.
An inception workshop was held in Mbalmayo to kick off the development of a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) for adaptation action in Cameroon.
Representatives from seven African countries explored key challenges in establishing MEL systems and emerging solutions.
Representatives from Botswana, Kenya, Liberia, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Somalia explored key challenges in establishing Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) systems and emerging solutions in a NAP Global Network’s peer learning event.
The M&E system sets out climate adaptation indicators and specifies responsibilities across the government at national and local levels.
Namibia is making progress on adaptation, and the government is stepping up efforts on monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) to track this progress.
Rwanda launched the process of developing a framework for the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) of adaptation actions in the agriculture sector in a workshop in Kigali.